Contents
- Why Financial Inclusion
- Previous attempts at Financial Inclusion
- Nationalization of Banks 1969
- Positives
- Negatives
- Jan Dhan Yojana
- Phase I (15th August, 2014-14th August,2015)
- Phase II, beginning from 15th August 2015 upto15th August,2018
- Aim of CFIP
- Facilities provided by PMJDY
- Implementation of CFIP
- For the Jan-Dhan Yojana to succeed the following steps are indicated
- Criticism of PMJDY
- What proponents say
Why Financial Inclusion
- To improve efficiency in public service delivery by trickling down the public funds such as subsidies, direct transfers, etc., to the intended ones
- Efficiency in public service is the key to narrow down poverty and establish an egalitarian society
- Financial inclusion has the potential to liberate the poor from the clutches of moneylenders
- Financial inclusion creates awareness towards social security schemes related to pension etc. creating an avenue to engage in savings for the old age
- Financial inclusion creates awareness regarding Alternate Investment Options like mutual funds, government securities and other such investment options.
- This will make inflation targeting easy as banks will have to greatly depend on the money form RBI.
Previous attempts at Financial Inclusion
Nationalization of Banks 1969
- Indira Gandhi’s bold move to nationalise 14 banks in 1969 (with another six being nationalised in 1980).
- Bank nationalisation was denounced as populist, a socialist gimmick, politically-motivated and worse
- Today, not many would question the beneficial impact nationalisation had on banking and the Indian economy
- An analysis post-Nationalization
Positives
- Bank nationalisation saw a huge expansion in branches into the hinterland.
- It improved formal credit system and reduced the influence of moneylenders.
- Despite initial setbacks, it benefited both the economy and the PSBs.
Negatives
- Investments in branches and the servicing of millions of small accounts pushed up operational costs in nationalised banks.
- Combined with bad loans, the investment resulted in the net worth of public sector banks turning negative by the early 1990s.
Changed scenarios
- At the same time, India’s economic growth began to accelerate in the 1990s.
- In these new conditions, the long-run benefits of financial inclusion began to kick in.
Jan Dhan Yojana
PMJDY consists of 6
pillars.
Phase I (15th August, 2014-14th August,2015)
- Universal access to banking facilities
- Financial Literacy Programme
- Providing Basic Banking Accounts with overdraft facility of Rs.5000 after six months and RuPay Debit card with inbuilt accident insurance cover of Rs 1 lakh and RuPay Kisan card
Phase II, beginning from 15th August 2015 upto15th August,2018
- Creation of Credit Guarantee Fund for coverage of defaults in overdraft A/Cs
- Micro Insurance
- Unorganized sector Pension schemes like Swavlamban.
- Comprehensive Financial Inclusion Plan (CFIP) is the latest move towards Financial inclusion
- The Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana is a part of Comprehensive Financial Inclusion Plan (CFIP)
Aim of CFIP
- CFIP hopes to extend coverage of basic financial services to all excluded households.
Facilities provided by PMJDY
- After satisfactory conduct of accounts it is proposed to offer reasonable need-based credit facilities
- A smart card (RuPay card) will be issued to enable customers to operate their accounts even without Banking Correspondents (visit mrunal.org for basics).
Implementation of CFIP
For the Jan-Dhan Yojana to succeed the following steps are indicated
- Technology adaptation
- Improving the system of business correspondent
- Extended to include entities such as kirana shops, corporates and others.
- It is obvious that BCs need to be properly remunerated and have the full support of banks.
- E-KYCs with the help of Aadhaar
- Insistence on KYC (know your customer) norms has hindered the opening of new accounts even in urban areas.
- Improving Mobile banking service
- Since mobile banking through phones is to play an increasingly important role in a scenario where physical bank branches will be few, greater co-ordination between mobile telephone companies and banks will be necessary.
- Support from state governments
- Commercial viability
- It will be the key to the programme’s success.
- Past experience suggests that without proper incentives, the facilities on offer will not be used by the really needy.
- Banks will be saddled with a large number of dormant accounts.
Criticism of PMJDY
- Costly and unviable.
- It will create huge stresses in the banking system.
- Many of the new accounts created by inclusion initiatives in recent years have low balances or remain inoperative.
- The scheme only fooled the poor by making their hard earned savings vulnerable to external financial shocks
- The government is risking poor man’s financial security by making them vulnerable to banking system marred with non-performing assets.
- Most of the facilities like accident insurance cover, overdraft facility etc. have money loopholes which the common man doesn’t understand.
What proponents say
- It brings in low-cost deposits through savings and current accounts.
- For PSBs, the high proportion of low-cost deposits in total deposits turned out to be a source of competitive advantage.
- It could see the household saving rate go up and boost the overall saving rate.
- Improve PSBs which have been losing market share to new private sector banks.
- Financial inclusion entails upfront costs but begins to pay off once a certain scale has been reached.
- Large amounts are poised to flow into bank accounts, thanks to the direct benefit transfer scheme (DBT).
0 comments:
Post a Comment